Supreme Court case could halt birthright citizenship loophole for good

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a case involving President Trump’s Executive Order on birthright citizenship. The case turns on one critical phrase in the Fourteenth Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The Court’s interpretation of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” will have major consequences for immigration enforcement, national security and the meaning of American citizenship.

If the Court rules that every illegal alien in the United States is fully “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, it would grant automatic citizenship to virtually every child born on U.S. soil — except children of diplomats and children of members of invading armies (setting aside the citizenship provided to Native Americans through legislation). The effects would be significant and largely irreversible.

And it would magnify several serious problems:

ALITO BLASTS LAWYER’S WORD-SALAD BLURRING ASYLUM LAW

• Explosion of Birth Tourism: Foreign nationals already travel to the United States to secure citizenship for their children (at least until the Trump Administration took steps to end the practice). A broad ruling would supercharge this practice in future administrations. Any pregnant woman who reaches American soil — on a tourist visa, by overstaying, or by crossing the border illegally — could guarantee her baby U.S. citizenship. American hospitals and taxpayers would bear the added costs.  
• National Security Risks: Future children born here to Chinese intelligence officers or agents of adversarial governments (not here on some diplomatic status) would automatically become U.S. citizens. They could later access security clearances and sensitive positions while owing primary allegiance elsewhere. The same threat exists with the children of cartel leaders, whose organizations already operate inside the United States.  
• Stronger Pull for Illegal Immigration: Automatic citizenship acts as one of the strongest magnets for more illegal immigration. It sends a clear message: reach U.S. soil and give birth, and your family gains a permanent foothold. This would intensify the strain on schools, hospitals, housing, and public services.  
• Anchor Babies and Enforcement Breakdown: Illegal alien parents would potentially gain even more powerful political leverage. Deporting them after their child is declared a U.S. citizen would turn routine law enforcement into an emotional media battle. This undermines deterrence and rewards those who break our immigration laws.

We cannot overlook the consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. The right decision here — applying the plain meaning of the text at the time of its adoption — restores and protects the value of citizenship and the American identity. It would benefit the country significantly in countless ways that others have articulated elsewhere.

And if the Court correctly holds that illegal aliens and temporary visitors are not fully subject to U.S. jurisdiction, it remains entirely possible for a future (and extraordinarily foolish) Congress to use the democratic process to provide citizenship to illegal aliens through some sort of amnesty. Again, it would be a terrible policy move, but it would remain possible.

NEARLY ALL REPUBLICAN AGS ADD FIREPOWER TO TRUMP’S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP PUSH

But if the Court constitutionalizes birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens, the damage becomes nearly permanent. Ordinary legislation cannot override it. The only remedy would be a constitutional amendment, which is effectively impossible in today’s political environment, where the minority parties in both chambers of Congress refuse to even prioritize the needs of traveling American citizens over those of illegal aliens facing deportation.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The Fourteenth Amendment was never meant to grant automatic citizenship to children of people who enter or remain here illegally. It was ratified after the Civil War to secure the rights of freed slaves. Restoring the original meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is not radical. It is faithful to the text and history of the Amendment.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Supreme Court now faces a high-stakes decision. The American people deserve a ruling grounded in constitutional text and common sense — one that protects the value of citizenship, defends the interests of the American people, and upholds the rule of law.

The Court must get this right.