When eight-year-old Yvonne began refusing to go to school, her parents were frantic. A bright, intense child, easily excitable, easily upset, she suddenly couldn’t bear how her clothes felt and often refused to get dressed. Her teacher noticed her covering her ears in class and gently suggested an autism assessment. Her parents didn’t know what to do.
Yvonne’s story is not unusual. Children haven’t changed, but childhood has. Over the past two decades, young people have been increasingly smothered in psychiatric labels. No generation has been as medicated, monitored, or mentally categorized as today’s. And now, in a striking cultural twist, many teenagers are embracing their diagnoses as part of their identity – as if attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, or autism were fashion statements or social badges of belonging.
What’s going on? Has this explosion of mental health awareness liberated young people to be “who they truly are”? Or has it trapped them in a culture of fragility, convincing them they are broken or otherwise socially unfit before they’ve even reached adulthood?
The Mental Health Industrial Complex
While more money than ever is being poured into therapy, medication, and mental health services, global mental well-being is declining. This recognized trend is known as the Treatment Prevalence Paradox (TPP): the more we treat, the worse the statistics get.
Suicide rates are climbing. Antidepressant use is soaring. Disability claims for mental illness are up across the West. International studies show that young people, especially those in English-speaking nations, report the lowest mental well-being of any demographic. Despite record spending, the mental health crisis keeps deepening.
We wouldn’t accept this in any other branch of medicine. Cancer outcomes are improving. Heart disease and diabetes mortality are falling. But in mental health, treatment seems to correlate with worsening outcomes. The uncomfortable truth is that our current approach may be part of the problem.
The Trouble with Diagnosis
Having studied this for three decades, it’s clear to me that the science of mental health is built on shaky ground. There is no biological test for depression or ADHD. You can’t see anxiety on a brain scan or find autism in a blood sample. You can’t examine a thought under the microscope. Psychiatric diagnoses are constructs – ideas, not discoveries.
Distress is real; despair is real. But the labels we attach to them are human inventions, not objective truths. Over the years, these categories have expanded to capture ever more shades of unhappiness and difference, and that expansion has proven extraordinarily profitable. As a child and adolescent psychiatrist, I have seen how this changes how young people view themselves.
The Mental Health Industrial Complex is a vast ecosystem of pharmaceutical companies, therapists, assessment clinics, apps, influencers, training programs, institutes, and a whole variety of other products that thrive on our unease. The more we believe that sadness, shyness, or stress are symptoms of illness, the more customers the system creates.
We are told to “end the stigma,” but what if these anti-stigma campaigns have contributed to creating the very problems they were meant to de-stigmatize?
New Identities and New Disorders
Mental health and identity politics have fused into something new. Conditions once considered rare and disabling, such as autism or ADHD, have been rebranded as proud identities, often amplified by social media.
A recent study found an explosion in self-diagnosed cases of Tourette’s, Dissociative Identity Disorder, and eating disorders among teenage girls. Many said identifying with a diagnosis helped them feel seen, part of a community, even special. Mental illness had become a language for belonging in a disconnected world.
Yet this trend, far from empowering, may be inadvertently eroding natural resilience. It tells young people that their struggles are signs of defectiveness, not of humanity.
As I argue in my book Searching for Normal, this shift is profoundly harmful. Academic psychiatry offered the language, Big Pharma offered the products, and the marketplace ran wild. What began as care has metastasized into an industry that feeds on vulnerability and sells relief in the form of labels, pills, therapies, and identities.
Our children are the most exposed. They are growing up in a world where ordinary developmental turbulence – anxiety about exams, heartbreak, existential confusion – can become interpreted through a medical lens. Instead of learning to weather emotion, they are encouraged to outsource it to professionals.
Older generations weren’t tougher or wiser – just less observed. We made mistakes, acted out, and suffered – and we grew through it. Today’s youth, constantly watched, measured, and judged, rarely get that chance.
What We’ve Forgotten
There is no formula for raising emotionally healthy children. But there is one rule that might save us from the grip of the Mental Health Industrial Complex: don’t pathologize emotion.
Fear, anger, sadness, and confusion are not diseases; they are signals – communications that are part of the messiness of being alive. Take them seriously, but keep them in the realm of the understandable, not the medical. Hold diagnoses lightly, if you must hold them at all.
After months of chaos, Yvonne’s parents, with the help and guidance of her maternal grandparents, whom she was close to, followed this approach. They resisted the autism label, stayed consistent, and refused to let school avoidance define her. It took two tough terms, but Yvonne is thriving now. No medication. No diagnosis. Just patience, love, and allowing the hard work of growing up to happen.
Sometimes, the cure is remembering that pain is not always pathology.
Dr. Sami Timimi is a child and adolescent psychiatrist, psychotherapist, and Fellow of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. He is the author of Searching for Normal: A New Approach to Understanding Mental Health, Distress, and Neurodiversity.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.
Read the full article here